[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] m_jenkins's Blog
When Are YOU Going To Wake Up?
Last comment by MrTowlie 5 years, 10 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

As you enjoy the safety of America's ignorant slumber, do you ever foresee a time when you will throw off that warm, fuzzy blanket of deception and decide that the truth is worth fighting for? Will you ever experience the revelation that there is inherent danger in the lies this nation has cuddled up to? Are you growing weary of that sickening feeling that there is something you have been so far unwilling to face, yet that something is of the utmost importance? Do you find it disturbing that highly-trained professionals who are the experts in their field have been shouting out a warning to us all based on the laws of physics which have shaped our world since the beginning of recorded time, yet you have rejected or ignored their words at the request of known liars, murderers and con-artists?

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is an organization of over 2,100 experts who have voluntarily committed their time and experience to revealing the scientific-based evidence behind the collapse of World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7. Please visit them at http://www.ae911truth.org

Why is this so important? The world, especially this country, is moving towards (in fact many say we are there) a police state. The government's spying on it's own people is no different than what the Soviets and Nazis did. The people running the show in Washington are criminals and tyrants and they created the attacks of 9/11 to thrust this nation into the "War on Terror", a fraudulent, never-ending crime against humanity so professional killers could practice their skills. After all, killing is what the police and military are trained to do. That is their business and business is good because of the War on Terror.

What can you do to stop this? WAKE UP! Quit listening to lying politicians and the establishment-controlled media because they know what the truth is, but they won't ever tell you. Unless public awareness of the facts and evidence reaches high enough levels the m a i n s t r e a m media will continue to lie straight to your face and tell you there is no evidence of controlled demolition on 9/11. That is an outright LIE. There is overwhelming, in fact, undeniable evidence that explosives were placed in the buildings. You can stay asleep if you want, but your country needs you to be awake right now! I assure you that if I presented to you evidence that 9/11 was an inside job and you rejected that evidence, when the day finally comes that the truth be known, I will happily ridicule you for your cowardice in facing the truth. The longer you sleep the worse it will be. I have talked to thousands and they saw the truth in the evidence. I do not convince anyone, I merely show them the evidence. It's time for you to wake up and look for yourself!


Latest Activity: Mar 12, 2020 at 11:56 PM



Blog has been viewed (1209) times.

AlburySmith commented on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 15:44 PM

Here's some recent news on WTC 7:
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20F...
As you can see, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Aegis Insurance Services, Inc., Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., National Union Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, and Underwriters at Lloyds [Syndicates 1225 and 1511] sued 7 World Trade Company, L.P., Silverstein Development Corp., and Silverstein Properties, Inc. for negligence (not deliberate criminality) after WTC 7's collapse crushed ConEd's ~$300 million substation.
Your 9/11 "truth movement" wants a real investigation with subpoena power, so why weren't Richard Gage and his "experts" called to tesify for the plaintiffs? Please note that a number of FDNY claimed on record that the fires in WTC were major, and Chief Daniel Nigro reported "more fire" in WTC 7 on September 11 than he had "seen in [his] entire career" before the 9/11 fires in the World Trade Center Towers. Since Gage claims that the fires in WTC 7 were minor and inconsequential, shouldn't ConEd's counsel have called him as an expert witness? This all happened in a federal courthouse less than 4 miles south of ReThink9/11's shiny new Times Square billboard enlightening everyone to the real truth about WTC 7's collapse, yet plaintiffs with $314.5 million at stake didn't even mention them and their work.
Aren't they as smart as you are?

m_jenkins commented on Monday, Dec 30, 2013 at 19:14 PM

Simple, the plaintiffs were told by the really powerful people behind the attacks of 9/11 to keep Richard Gage out of that courtroom because Gage could expose the crime that Silverstein and his criminal partners committed. The guilty are being protected.

Surely you have seen and heard the video footage of police officers directing emergency workers away from Building 7 stating, "This building is going to be coming down soon". There was even a broadcast countdown over emergency channels announcing the collapse of the structure.

It is very clear from the video footage of Building 7 that it was NOT engulfed in fire.

Building 7 fell at free-fall acceleration for the first 100 feet. This can only be achieved by simultaneously removing all vertical support columns, something even the hottest fire could NOT do.

Traces of nano-thermite and the telltale evidence of thermetic reactions was found throughout the dust and debris of all the buildings which collapsed on that day.

Temperatures in excess of 1,500 F. were recorded up to 6 weeks after the collapse in the basements of the buildings. The highest temperatures recorded were around 2,800 F. Tell me what was in the buildings that would create temperatures of 2,800 F.?

What bright orange molten metal was pouring out of the corner of the South Tower before its collapse?

m_jenkins commented on Monday, Dec 30, 2013 at 19:27 PM

I read Chief Daniel Nigro statement and although I can't prove it (yet) I would bet that he was paid off to make that statement. I'm sure there have been a lot of pay-offs in and around New York to keep the truth from coming out. Whoever is paying out is wasting their money because there is way too much evidence which cannot be hidden.

9/11 was an Inside Job!

We know it and the cops and firefighters in New York know it too.

AlburySmith commented on Monday, Dec 30, 2013 at 20:40 PM

ConEd and its insurers sued for $314.5 million and never even mentioned this alleged C/D. Industrial Risk Insurers paid Silverstein Properties $861 million for WTC 7 without mentioning the secret C/D. The FDNY established a safety perimeter around WTC 7 hours before the 5:21 PM collapse, and few to no FDNY are in the 9/11 "truth movement." You have WAY too many "conspirators."
Read the link I posted. There are PLENTY of FDNY accounts of WTC 7's fires. They were hardly minor and inconsequential, and the FDNY's decision prevented many deaths.
Search YouTube for " WTC 7 fires and south side hole " and judge them for yourself.

m_jenkins commented on Monday, Dec 30, 2013 at 22:40 PM

Larry Silverstein said the decision was made to "pull the building". Pulling a building is C/D terminology for bringing a building down. Are you suggesting that either the fire fighters rigged the building for detonation or there was a simultaneous failure of all of the core columns due to fire?

Why would Silverstein and the FDNY think that Building 7 would fall down when no other steel-framed skyscraper in history had ever fallen because of fire? (Buildings 1 & 2 exploded so they don't count)

Building 7 had been reinforced to be much stronger than its original design. How did Silverstein and the FDNY bring down Building 7?

AlburySmith commented on Tuesday, Dec 31, 2013 at 08:11 AM

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that THEY WERE NOT SURE THEY WERE GONNA BE ABLE TO CONTAIN THE FIRE, and I said, 'WE'VE HAD SUCH TERRIBLE LOSS OF LIFE, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And THEY [THE FDNY!] made that decision to pull and then we watc-hed the building collapse." –L. Silverstein

"We have never, ever heard the term 'pull it' being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we've spoken with." -Brent Blanchard of Protec in A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WTC TOWERS 1, 2, & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION VIEWPOINT
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article...
(Check it yourself on any C/D contractor's web site.)
If Larry Silverstein publicly admitted to blowing up his own property, why did Swiss Re, Lloyd's, Zurich Financial, Copenhagen Re, and 8 other major insurers all pay him a total of $4.68 BILLION? They all fought his 2 planes = 2 incidents claims, and most of them won in court.

m_jenkins commented on Tuesday, Dec 31, 2013 at 15:14 PM

Isn't it amazing the crimes these people are able to get away with? Larry Silverstein is connected to some of the most powerful criminals on this earth. It's not about the money. The elites have all the money they want or need and when they want more they just print it. The forces behind the crimes of 9/11 are much bigger than insurance companies, in fact they own the insurance companies and the banks. See my post "Kennedy Knew About the 9/11 Terrorists". You have to think much bigger to understand 9/11. These criminals are so brazen they don't even care if what they do becomes obvious. For example, who was it who was responsible for the destruction of crime scene evidence? The Department of Justice, in fact Assistant U.S. Attorney General Michael Chertoff allowed the removal and destruction of the WTC steel in plain sight of the whole world and nobody could do a thing to stop him. That steel held the forensic evidence that would have proved the existence of explosives in the buildings, but there again, what does that matter? We already have enough evidence that proves nano-thermite reactions took place in the buildings and nobody in the government gives a s*** about investigating that. Why? Because it would expose the government's involvement

AlburySmith commented on Tuesday, Dec 31, 2013 at 17:02 PM

ConEd and Aegis plus 5 other insurance companies don't give a s*** about their $314.5 million lawsuit, Swiss Re, LLoyd's, Zurich Financial, Copenhagen Re and 8 other insurance companies didn't give a s*** about the $4.68 billion they paid Silverstein Properties, the FDNY doesn't give a s*** about 343 dead firefighters, and the list just keeps growing. 230+ NIST investigators don't give a s*** about the truth, nor does the ASCE, NCSEA, SEI, AIA, RIBA, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, structuremag.org, ENR, etc.

m_jenkins commented on Tuesday, Dec 31, 2013 at 20:21 PM

I didn't say anything of the sort. I think you need to re-read what I said and that was the government doesn't give a s*** about investigating the presence of explosive materials in the buildings. Evidence of them not giving a s*** is the NIST report that was and is a scientific joke. Not even peer reviewed.

NIST investigators? NIST violated federal law when they skipped over the part of their so-called investigation which required them to check for evidence of explosive materials.

It is clear that you are one of those debunkers who is working to hide the truth. You are probably a government employee. Your attempt to put words in my mouth about FDNY not caring about 343 dead firefighters really burns my a** because my father was a firefighter and I know they care a lot about their co-workers.

I won't be responding to you anymore because my time is better spent showing the evidence to people who are not working to hide the truth. Your arguments are irrelevant fabrications like those of most debunkers.

m_jenkins commented on Tuesday, Dec 31, 2013 at 20:36 PM

For those who want to get to know the heart and soul of the 9/11 terrorists take a look a the writings of Christopher Bollyn in his book "Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World". The compiled works of his decade-long investigation can be read online at http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-th...

It's so sad that one of our so-called closest allies was the central force behind the attacks of 9/11. As you will read in Bollyn's book, Zionist figures were present in every aspect of the crime in order to exercise control of events.

Prominent Zionist Figures involved in 9/11 crime:

Larry Silverstein and his partner Frank Lowy

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Michael Chertoff

There are many, many more. Read Christopher Bollyn's book "Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World"

AlburySmith commented on Wednesday, Jan 01, 2014 at 07:35 AM

How many FDNY are in your 9/11 "truth movement"? The ones quoted here:
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%252...
completely contradict Gage's lies about the fires in WTC 7. Erik Lawyer's "Firefighters" for 9/11 "Truth" petition has ~6 signatories who even CLAIM to be FDNY. Lawyer's flat-out lying about NFPA 921:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.ph...
and about the GZ investigation. Stevie Wonder would've seen C/D on the steel, and SEAoNY, PANYNJ, FEMA BPAT, NSF, and other structural engineers were on site for the entire ~8 months of cleanup.
Since you're still libeling Larry Silverstein, please feel free to explain why Swiss Re, Lloyd's, Zurich Financial, Copenhagen Re, and 8 other major insurers all paid him a total of $4.68 BILLION. They all fought his 2 planes = 2 incidents claims, and most of them won in court. ConEd and its insurers aren't interested in 9/11 troofer crap either.

m_jenkins commented on Monday, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:21 AM

$4.68 billion, so what? The criminals behind 9/11 aren't worried about money. They easily transferred that much wealth right out of the pockets of the American taxpayer just in defense contracts alone, not to mention their ability to create money out of thin air, which amounts to yet another transfer of wealth from the pockets of the American taxpayer into the hands of the global elite. It's a scam, a racket, and if paying off Larry to make it look good is what needs to be done then they will make it happen.

AlburySmith commented on Tuesday, Jan 07, 2014 at 20:00 PM

So Swiss Re, Lloyd's, Zurich Financial, Copenhagen Re, and 8 other major insurers are all criminals behind the al Qaeda suicide attacks of 9/11? Most insurance companies have legal departments that investigate suspicious claims, and they refuse to pay and then prosecute for fraud. Is Larry Silverstein your imaginary 9/11 perp now, or is it still the evil US gubmint that wanted an excuse to invade Afghanistan and steal their oil? Considering the billions he lost despite the insurance payout, he makes a pretty lousy perp.

m_jenkins commented on Thursday, Jan 09, 2014 at 14:52 PM

So you are saying that we must rely on the investigations of these insurance companies in order to determine who was or was not responsible for 9/11?

Silverstein lost billions despite the insurance payout? Really?

Would that be the same al Qaeda that used chemical weapons on the Syrian people or the ones that were allowed to take over Libya? Do you mean the al Qaeda that was created and funded by the CIA? It was hardly a suicide attack when many of the hijackers have been seen a l i v e and well throughout Europe since 9/11.

They couldn't pay me enough to do what you are doing. There is something about truth, liberty and being American that would prevent me from ever working to destroy this country.

MrTowlie commented on Friday, Jan 10, 2014 at 14:51 PM

One question; who owns the insurance companies?

AlburySmith commented on Saturday, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:41 PM

There is no "al Qaeda that was created and funded by the CIA," and I'd suggest that you read the news a little more carefully. The Shiite Assad regime used chemical weapons on the Syrian people, and AQ is part of the insurgency fighting the regime.
If you know of any 9/11 hijackers who "have been seen a l i v e and well throughout Europe since 9/11," please get some taped interviews with them and sell them to the world's media. You'll very quickly become rich and famous.
Silverstein did lose billions in spite of the ~$4.68 billion insurance settlement; he's contractually obligated to rebuild at huge cost, has lost tenants and cash flow for more than 12 years, repaid his WTC creditors, and has to pay $10 million/mo rent to the Port Authority for the property he leased, even without buildings on it that produce revenue. I wouldn't recommend going into real estate management if you think that was a good deal for him.
Truth, liberty, and being American are foreign concepts to you and your ridiculous 9/11 "truth movement"; you're into exculpating al Qaeda and libeling its victims.

AlburySmith commented on Saturday, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:46 PM

@MrTowlie: Are you referring to the 12 insurance companies that pay hundreds of millions each to people who blow up their own buildings, or the ones in the ConEd/Aegis case who don't care if they win $314.5 million lawsuits?

m_jenkins commented on Saturday, Jan 11, 2014 at 17:50 PM

@AlburySmith, just like Osama bin Laden was never trained and supported by the CIA? Oh, and I'm talking about the Osama bin Laden that died from Marfans Syndrome in December 2001 and WAS NOT wanted by the FBI in connection with 9/11 due to lack of evidence associating him with the crime, NOT the Osama bin Laden who was gunned down by the murdered Seal team at his "compound" and then dumped into the ocean by some dim-witted naval commander who thought it best to hide the evidence which was paramount in this so-called "War on Terror", because at this point no one will be surprised if this lying government said, "We made a mistake. That wasn't the real Osama we killed, he was an impostor, so now we are once again wasting billions of taxpayer dollars looking for the world's most dangerous man." What a joke. Do they really think that anyone believes a word they say anymore?

AlburySmith commented on Sunday, Jan 12, 2014 at 13:47 PM

Osama bin Laden's 3 wives and 11 children living with him in Abbottabad until the CIA-led SEAL raid offed him on May 2, 2011 weren't aware of his untimely demise in 2001, nor was the government of Pakistan. AQ immediately threatened the US with retaliation for killing him, so they could benefit from your vast knowledge too.
If the FBI had a "lack of evidence" connecting your hero to AQ's Planes Operation, Dale Watson needs to be brought up to speed:
http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/the...
Since the FBI's part of the evil US gubmint that you claim was framing him for the 9/11 SUICIDE attacks, it would be rather foolish of them to say they didn't have any evidence for it, now wouldn't it?
Do they really think that anyone believes a word YOU say anymore?

m_jenkins commented on Sunday, Jan 12, 2014 at 20:51 PM

@AlburySmith, you are just repeating the "official story" that everyone heard on the news. So what? You see the thing is the American people know that the "official story" is a bunch of LIES. They don't believe the "official story" anymore. They don't believe the establishment-owned media anymore. I don't know what to say to you because obviously you still do believe them and I'm sorry for you.

Once a person has been awakened to the truth there is no going back. Once you have seen enough evidence that you have been lied to extensively, you loose all faith in those who deceived you. There is a mass awakening going on all around the globe AlburySmith in case you were not aware of that. You either haven't woken up yet OR you are getting paid to hide the truth. If you simply haven't woken up yet, then I hope that happens for you soon. On the other hand, if you are fully aware of truth, yet you are working to hide it, then you are guilty of heinous crimes against humanity. To conceal acts of treason is in itself an act of treason. If you are paid to say what you say, is it really worth it?

AlburySmith commented on Monday, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:38 AM

If you have a problem with the official story from the government of Pakistan, al Qaeda itself, and OBL's 3 wives and 11 children who resided with him in Abbottabad until May, 2011, please take it up with them.
TIA

m_jenkins commented on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 15:05 PM

I wouldn't believe the Pakistani government's statements any more than I would believe the State Department's once the MSM has put their hands on it.

AlburySmith commented on Thursday, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:39 AM

The mainstr eam ARAB media? OBL's 3 wives and 11 children who liv ed in Abbottabad with him and are now back in SA (one wife went to Yemen)? What's credible to you? Totally unsubstantiated Internet rumors?
[spaces to avoid words "s----m," and "l--e."]

m_jenkins commented on Thursday, Jan 16, 2014 at 16:34 PM

Unsubstantiated rumors is what the MSM bases their news broadcasts on. Along with outright fabrications and deceptions. The world is waking up to the misinformation network the government and the MSM maintain.

AlburySmith commented on Friday, Jan 17, 2014 at 13:04 PM

The MSM are a whole lot more credible than 9/11 truther nut web sites, and are in total agreement over the al Qaeda suicide attacks of 9/11, as well as the May 2, 2011 SEAL raid that offed your hero.

m_jenkins commented on Sunday, Jan 19, 2014 at 21:14 PM

If you are talking about Osama bin Laden then to say he is my hero would be a flat out LIE. So who is speaking LIES here? You?

The MSM is owned by a relative handful of globalist swine who try and establish false credibility by ensuring all of their stories (LIES) don't contradict each other. They cannot be trusted.

AlburySmith commented on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 18:38 PM

Who owns the MSM in Pakistan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Sudan, Syria, Egypt, etc.? They don't drink 9/11 "truth movement" Kool-Aid either.

m_jenkins commented on Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:37 AM

There are some problems with the official story which cannot be avoided.

1. How did al-Qaeda secure tons of nano-thermite and then place it in the buildings?

(Answer: The elevator shafts of the towers had recently undergone renovation to replace the fire-retardant material on the structural steel. This included the spraying of new material on the steel. Sol-gel Nano-Thermite, commonly known as Energetic Nanocomposites, can be sprayed out of a gun just like paint and once it dries on the surface it can be ignited by temperatures much lower than that required by nano-thermite. Energetic Nanocomposites create approximately 2x the explosive force of traditional high-explosives. The workers who did the work probably didn't even know they were spraying materials which were highly-explosive once dried. The company which provided these materials to the contractor is a prime suspect, one of many others who played their parts in pre-loading the buildings with explosives. Silverstein's Building 7 had recently undergone much work which opened up a trading floor and retrofitted some of the building's structural components. It is more than likely that someone who performed work in that building was responsible for placing the explosive materials which were required to bring down Building 7 in the way that it fell.)

Explosives were mandatory equipment needed to produce the physical destruction we saw on 9/11/2001. There is no other way the buildings could have been demolished. It would have been physically impossible for any of the three buildings to collapse without the use of high-explosives. It would have been simply impossible!

AlburySmith commented on Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:19 AM

What "tons of nano-thermite"? Harrit, Jones, and your other crackpots were "reminded" of it by rust, sulfur, aluminum, etc. in some WTC dust samples, and failed to provide any exemplars of it for comparison. Try spraying it on a W14 X 130 column and let me know how it all works out for you.
The NIST reports fully explain all 3 WTC hi-rise collapses on 9/11.

m_jenkins commented on Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:28 PM

The NIST reports DO NOT explain the collapse of any buildings. The only "crackpots" involved work for NIST. That organization is a collection of paid liars and idiots who don't know what they are talking about. They get paid to say whatever crap they are told to say.

AlburySmith commented on Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 at 16:11 PM

The NIST WTC investigators are ~65% civilian contractors paid to do sound engineering work. Your crackpots profit from lying:
https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lie...

m_jenkins commented on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:07 AM

LMAOROF

AlburySmith commented on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:47 AM

Inserting words into someone's statement and then libeling him with nonsense is amusing to you?

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that THEY WERE NOT SURE THEY WERE GONNA BE ABLE TO CONTAIN THE FIRE, and I said, 'WE'VE HAD SUCH TERRIBLE LOSS OF LIFE, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And THEY [THE FDNY!] made that decision to pull and then we watc_hed the building collapse." –L. Silverstein

"We have never, ever heard the term 'pull it' being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we've spoken with." -Brent Blanchard of Protec in A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WTC TOWERS 1, 2, & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION VIEWPOINT
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article...
(Check it yourself on any C/D contractor's web site.)

If Larry Silverstein publicly admitted to blowing up his own property, why did Swiss Re, Lloyd's, Zurich Financial, Copenhagen Re, and 8 other major insurers all pay him a total of $4.68 BILLION? They all fought his 2 planes = 2 incidents claims, and most of them won in court.

MrTowlie commented on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 at 19:40 PM

;)


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by m_jenkins
 
DHS Assisting Terrorists\Causing Fear
March 20, 2020
It seems a bit ironic that the federal agency created in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks with the specific mission of preventing terrorists from carrying out attacks in this country has now been exposed for doing the exact opposite. Revelations came from Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) about a ...
Read More »
 
Incompetence or Patriotic Sabotage?
February 12, 2020
As critical to the success of Obama's namesake, government-operated healthcare system, the healthcare.gov website was the primary tool which the American people would have used in order to sign up for Obamacare. However the October 1st roll-out of this website was a catastrophic disaster marked by by the inability of ...
Read More »
 
After All, What is a Conspiracy Theory?
February 12, 2020
A conspiracy is two or more people who engage in the planning and execution of an act, commonly one that is illegal and\or damaging in some way. Let's focus on criminal conspiracy. Did you know that if you and another person plan a crime together and get caught after committing ...
Read More »
 
Fantastic Work to Reveal Truth
February 12, 2020
Yet another great documentary has been produced on the subject of 9/11 called "September 11: The New Pearl Harbor". In September of 2000, a Washington-based think tank published a report entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.” Contained within this document are these words referring ...
Read More »
 
Forensic Investigation Reveals Truth
February 12, 2020
In spite of everything we were told about the attacks of 9/11 which turned out to be false, a growing number of Americans want answers to their questions regarding what really happened on that day. Maybe it seemed strange that for the first time in the history of the steel-framed, ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology